Assessment of Smile Index Variation Across Different Malocclusions

Atanasova, Sandra and Arsovski, Ljupka and Longurova, Natasa and Toneva Stojmenova, Verica and Nikolovski, Bruno and Zarkova Atanasova, Julija and Naskova, Sanja and Zlatanovska, Katerina and Carceva Salja, Sofija and Prosheva Pelivanova, Ljubica (2025) Assessment of Smile Index Variation Across Different Malocclusions. In: FDI World Dental Congress 2025 (FDIWDC25), 09-12 Sept 2025, Shanghai, China.

[thumbnail of International Dental Journal.pdf] Text
International Dental Journal.pdf

Download (344kB)
[thumbnail of Assessment Of Smile Index Variation Across Different Malocclusions.pdf] Text
Assessment Of Smile Index Variation Across Different Malocclusions.pdf

Download (429kB)

Abstract

Aim: The smile index is a valuable characteristic for comparing smiles between individuals or tracking changes over time in the same person. This study aimed to assess the smile index in untreated patients with different types of malocclusions.
Materials and Methods: The study included 60 participants (25 males, 35 females) aged 16 to 35 years, categorized into three groups of 20 participants each, based on the type of malocclusion. Standardized extraoral photographs with a posed smile were taken, and photogrammetric analysis was performed using specialized image analysis software to determine the smile index for each participant. Statistical analysis was conducted using SPSS version 26.0.
Results:The overall mean value was 7.05 ± 2.26mm. For p >0.05, no significant differences were observed between the three classes of malocclusion. The highest average smile index value was observed in Class I (7.44 ± 3.27mm), while the lowest was in Class III (6.83 ± 1.51mm), with F=0.441, df =2, and p=0.646. The smile index for Class II was 6.89 ±1.64mm. The index was significantly higher in males compared to females in Class I (t(18)= 3.275, p= 0.004). In Class II, the difference was not statistically significant, with females showing a slightly higher value (t(18)= 0.710, p= 0.487), and in Class III, no significant difference was observed (t(18) = 0.041, p= 0.968).
Conclusion: Orthodontists should consider smile aesthetics during diagnosis, treatment planning, and the selection of treatment methods before initiating orthodontic therapy.
Keywords: index, mini-esthetics, smile.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)
Impact Factor Value: 3.7
Subjects: Medical and Health Sciences > Other medical sciences
Divisions: Faculty of Medical Science
Depositing User: Sandra Atanasova
Date Deposited: 05 Nov 2025 10:01
Last Modified: 05 Nov 2025 10:01
URI: https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/id/eprint/36724

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item