Планирање на минатото - сонување на иднината: народи, етногенези и политика во бугарската и македонската медиевистика (споредбена анализа)

Stojkov, Stojko (2016) Планирање на минатото - сонување на иднината: народи, етногенези и политика во бугарската и македонската медиевистика (споредбена анализа). In: Меѓународна научна конференција 70 години институт за историја - 70 години македонска историографија, 12 Dec 2016, Skopje, Macedonia. (Unpublished)

[thumbnail of Programme 70 години ИИ.pdf]
Preview
Text
Programme 70 години ИИ.pdf

Download (578kB) | Preview
[thumbnail of S. Stojkov 2.pdf]
Preview
Text
S. Stojkov 2.pdf

Download (350kB) | Preview

Abstract

This paper examines two neighboring historiographies - Macedonian and Bulgarian in their interpretations of the idea of "ethnogenesys" in the Middle Ages. Both meet there as competitors and rivals. Comparison is done between them in quantitative and qualitative terms, not in order to determine the right or wrong, but to address the reasons which led to promotion or dismissal of some or other positions. It traces the impact of political change on the interpretation of historical processes. The conclusion is that the political realities play a crucial role in creating ethno-genetic and national historical interpretations. No changes in scientific knowledge led to changes in the positions of both historiography identity issues. It is noted that in disputes between two historiographies Bulgarian historiography appears active and aggressive, but not the actual initiator of the conflict. Contrary to widespread in science opinion that Macedonian historiography occurs as provocateur causing the conflict between them, I present proof that the real initiator was Bulgarian political leadership. In the 60-ies of 20th C., Bulgarian Communist leadership made series of secret decisions which instructed the Bulgarian historiography to begin aggressively denial of Macedonian identity through history and provided her with all needed resources. Thesis of "Macedonian historical provocation" offered the only justification for this attack. The real initial motive was to block any Macedonian territorial claims against Pirin Macedonia and actually historiographical war happened in parallel of the process of the campaign of denial and assimilation of Macedonians in Bulgaria. The political and national conflict is seen here as a motivator in the process of building positions in both historiographies. The article traces the ethno-genetic highlights in both countries and their relation to current events in the Balkans. It is noted that relations between the two historiographies remain blocked in pseudo-scientific debating, and for its unblocking may contribute only serious political change.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Paper)
Subjects: Humanities > History and archaeology
Divisions: Faculty of Educational Science
Depositing User: Stojko Stojkov
Date Deposited: 20 Jun 2018 12:34
Last Modified: 20 Jun 2018 12:34
URI: https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/id/eprint/20099

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item