Orthopantomographic Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Adjacent to Overhanging Fixed Prosthetic Restorations

Zlatanovska, Katerina and Petrovski, Mihajlo and Longurova, Natasa and Zarkova Atanasova, Julija and Atanasova, Sandra and Nikolovski, Bruno and Prosheva Pelivanova, Ljubica and Kovacevska, Ivona and Papakoca, Kiro and Carceva-Salja, Sofija and Apostoloski, Pavle and Arsovski, Ljupka and Naskova, Sanja (2026) Orthopantomographic Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Adjacent to Overhanging Fixed Prosthetic Restorations. In: Oral Health Research Congress (CED/NOF-IADR), 3-5 Sept 2026, Lisbon, Portugal.

[thumbnail of 2026 CED_NOF-IADR Congress - Abstract book Katerina.pdf] Text
2026 CED_NOF-IADR Congress - Abstract book Katerina.pdf

Download (205kB)
[thumbnail of Orthopantomographic Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Adjacent.pdf] Text
Orthopantomographic Assessment of Alveolar Bone Loss Adjacent.pdf

Download (580kB)

Abstract

Introduction: Fixed prosthetic overhanging restorations represent restorations that extend beyond the prepared tooth margins into the interdental space. These oversized margins favor plaque accumulation, compromise oral hygiene, and also contribute to gingival inflammation and periodontal destruction.
Objective: The study aimed to evaluate alveolar bone loss in individuals with fixed prosthetic restorations presenting proximal overhangs utilizing orthopantomographic (OPG) analysis.
Material and method: Total number of 115 OPG was used for this investigation. Bone loss was measured as the distance between the cementoenamel junction (CEJ) and the limbus alveolaris on two-dimensional OPG images. Measurements greater than 2 mm were considered pathological. When the CEJ was not clearly visible, the adjacent tooth served as a reference. The percentage of overhang occupying the interproximal space was calculated and classified as small (<20%), moderate (20–50%), or large (>51%).
Results: The mean measured CEJ–alveolar limbus distance was 3.55 ± 0.77 mm. After subtracting the physiological 2 mm distance, the average bone loss associated with proximal overhang restorations was 1.86 ± 0.94 mm. Most patients (70.43%) exhibited moderate overhangs. Of particular concern, 9.56% of subjects presented large overhangs occupying more than half of the interdental space.
Conclusions: Our findings demonstrate that inadequately dimensioned fixed restorations contribute significantly to alveolar bone loss. The prevalence of large and moderate restoration overhanging suggests insufficient marginal adaptation. Ultimately, these overhanging restorations are directly correlated with the severity of periodontal disease, positioning them as a critical and avoidable iatrogenic factor in prosthodontics.

Item Type: Conference or Workshop Item (Poster)
Subjects: Medical and Health Sciences > Clinical medicine
Divisions: Faculty of Medical Science
Depositing User: Katerina Zlatanovska
Date Deposited: 21 Sep 2026 07:52
Last Modified: 21 Sep 2026 07:52
URI: https://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/id/eprint/39075

Actions (login required)

View Item
View Item