How robust are routinely collected data on Clostridium difficile infection for national surveillance purposes in Scotland?

Ivanovska, Verica (2002) How robust are routinely collected data on Clostridium difficile infection for national surveillance purposes in Scotland? Masters thesis, Glasgow University, UK.

[img]
Preview
Text
Master thesis Verica Ivanovska.pdf

Download (53Kb) | Preview

Abstract

This study aimed to examine the consistency and comparability of Scottish laboratories' data on Clostridium difficile by comparing the laboratories' selection criteria and testing methods for the detection of C. difficile infection and their definitions of 'a case' and 'an outbreak' of the infection. To examine the completeness and accuracy of C. difficile reporting to SCIEH by comparing laboratory records with the total numbers of positive laboratory reports and outbreaks of the infection reported to SCIEH for the period 1999-2001. It was an observational, descriptive cross-sectional survey using self-administered questionnaire. Data on routine reporting to SCIEH were also obtained. The study subjects were twenty six clinical microbiology laboratories that receive specimens for testing C. difficile infection. We found out that there is no uniformity in selection criteria currently used to test specimens for C. difficile infection. The most commonly used criteria were: presence of symptoms and/or high-risk groups (43.8 per cent), and a specific test request (37.5 per cent). Variations exist in the laboratory methods used to diagnose C. difficile infection. All laboratories used toxin identification methods. Sixty per cent used only one method in identifying the infection, while the rest employed two methods, usually culture and toxin confirmation. Most of the laboratories agreed on the main features of 'a case' and 'an outbreak' of C. difficile infection. The numbers of positive laboratory reports obtained by SCIEH and from questionnaires increased during the period 1999-2001. Comparison of the limited data obtained from laboratories with data from SCIEH indicated both underreporting and overreporting of the infection. We concluded that the study highlighted the extent of diversity in laboratory diagnostic practices and surveillance practices of C. difficile infection. Surveillance data currently available at the SCIEH database are not robust, as they are not illustrating the true incidence of C. difficile infection due to lack of standardised and cosnistent protocols for infection diagnosis and data reporting. We recommend that a national consensus has to be reached about standardisation of specimen criteria and testing methods for C. difficile infection. Laboratories should adhere to the standardised and consistent definitions when reporting data to SCIEH. They should report first positive laboratory tests within defined time period, in conjunction with some clinical information. A national surveillance system for C. difficile infection to provide more precise indicators of the incidence and outbreaks of the infection in Scotland will require improvement in current practices in data reporting. A national consensus is required on the identification and management of outbreaks.

Item Type: Thesis (Masters)
Subjects: Medical and Health Sciences > Health sciences
Divisions: Faculty of Medical Science
Depositing User: Verica Ivanovska
Date Deposited: 10 Apr 2017 10:04
Last Modified: 10 Apr 2017 10:04
URI: http://eprints.ugd.edu.mk/id/eprint/17696

Actions (login required)

View Item View Item